<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Coming Day of Reckoning for Business Method Patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/the-coming-day-of-reckoning-for-business-method-patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/the-coming-day-of-reckoning-for-business-method-patents/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:42:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: No Patent for Bilski, Business Methods Survive&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</title>
		<link>http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/the-coming-day-of-reckoning-for-business-method-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>No Patent for Bilski, Business Methods Survive&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/?p=493#comment-70</guid>
		<description>[...] The Federal Circuit was incorrect in holding that the machine-or-transformation test is the exclusive standard for defining the patent eligibility of a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Federal Circuit was incorrect in holding that the machine-or-transformation test is the exclusive standard for defining the patent eligibility of a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCOTUS Still Silent on Bilski&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</title>
		<link>http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/the-coming-day-of-reckoning-for-business-method-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>SCOTUS Still Silent on Bilski&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 14:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/?p=493#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...] No word yet from the U.S. Supreme Court on Bilski v. Kappos, the eagerly awaited decision which is likely to limit the scope (if not drive the final nail into the coffin) of allowable business method patents. You can find a description of the issues and stakes involved in my blog post on the Federal Circuit&#8217;s (lower court&#8217;s) machine-or-transformation test for.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No word yet from the U.S. Supreme Court on Bilski v. Kappos, the eagerly awaited decision which is likely to limit the scope (if not drive the final nail into the coffin) of allowable business method patents. You can find a description of the issues and stakes involved in my blog post on the Federal Circuit&#8217;s (lower court&#8217;s) machine-or-transformation test for&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is Technology?&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</title>
		<link>http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/the-coming-day-of-reckoning-for-business-method-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>What is Technology?&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/?p=493#comment-31</guid>
		<description>[...] 2008 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the Patent Office in setting a strict machine-or-transformation test that essentially bars the patenting of business methods except where they are tied to or transform [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2008 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the Patent Office in setting a strict machine-or-transformation test that essentially bars the patenting of business methods except where they are tied to or transform [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Before the Dawn&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</title>
		<link>http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/the-coming-day-of-reckoning-for-business-method-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Before the Dawn&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/?p=493#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] determine whether and to what extent business methods are still patentable. Yes, the Bilski case I&#8217;ve been blogging about ad nauseam for weeks. Instead of rehashing the same material in a separate blog piece, I&#8217;ll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] determine whether and to what extent business methods are still patentable. Yes, the Bilski case I&#8217;ve been blogging about ad nauseam for weeks. Instead of rehashing the same material in a separate blog piece, I&#8217;ll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reading Bilski&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</title>
		<link>http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/the-coming-day-of-reckoning-for-business-method-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Reading Bilski&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/?p=493#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] reading the transcript of the oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the Bilski case, which I previously posted on and which is going to rewrite the playbook for patent eligible subject matter. It seems pretty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading the transcript of the oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the Bilski case, which I previously posted on and which is going to rewrite the playbook for patent eligible subject matter. It seems pretty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
