<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Massachusetts Data Security Redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/massachusetts-data-security-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/massachusetts-data-security-redux/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:36:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MA Data Security Regulation Finalized &#8212; Finally!&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</title>
		<link>http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/massachusetts-data-security-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>MA Data Security Regulation Finalized &#8212; Finally!&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/?p=421#comment-22</guid>
		<description>[...] the risks involved. After wailing and lamentations from business groups, a near-final regulation (discussed in depth in this blog) was issued in August 2009 and shifted the regulatory standard to a more flexible, risk-based, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the risks involved. After wailing and lamentations from business groups, a near-final regulation (discussed in depth in this blog) was issued in August 2009 and shifted the regulatory standard to a more flexible, risk-based, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BBL&#8217;s New Offices and SF Data Security Recap&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</title>
		<link>http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/massachusetts-data-security-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>BBL&#8217;s New Offices and SF Data Security Recap&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/?p=421#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] such as the new Nevada statute (Senate Bill 227) requiring encryption and PCI DSS compliance and Massachusetts&#8217; recent move to make 201 CMR 17.00 more risk-based and technology neutral. Also on the agenda was California Senate Bill 20, which sets forth content requirements for data [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] such as the new Nevada statute (Senate Bill 227) requiring encryption and PCI DSS compliance and Massachusetts&#8217; recent move to make 201 CMR 17.00 more risk-based and technology neutral. Also on the agenda was California Senate Bill 20, which sets forth content requirements for data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
