<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Employee Online Privacy II:  Still No Biggie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/employee-online-privacy-ii-still-no-biggie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/employee-online-privacy-ii-still-no-biggie/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:36:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Merry Christmas from Baer Business Law&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</title>
		<link>http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/employee-online-privacy-ii-still-no-biggie/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Merry Christmas from Baer Business Law&#160;&#124;&#160;Baer Business Law &#8211; Greater Philadelphia Area &#8211; Intellectual Property Law &#8211; Business Law &#8211; E Commerce &#8211; Contracts &#8211; Trademarks &#8211; Copyrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baerbizlaw.com/category/blog/?p=401#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] This will likely be my last post before Christmas, and so, in the spirit of the season, I am leaving you with a few images of the December 19 blizzard in Philly &#8212; and one small workplace electronic privacy morsel. The Christmas blizzard Shake the snow from your boots, pull a chair up by the fire, and let&#8217;s touch briefly on Convertino v. U.S. Dep&#8217;t of Justice, Civ. No. 04-236 (D.D.C. Dec. 10, 2009). This ruling by a federal district court in Washington, D.C. is being hailed as the next in the Stengart v. Loving Care Agency, Inc. line of cases that supposedly vindicate an employee&#8217;s right to electronic privacy in the workplace. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This will likely be my last post before Christmas, and so, in the spirit of the season, I am leaving you with a few images of the December 19 blizzard in Philly &#8212; and one small workplace electronic privacy morsel. The Christmas blizzard Shake the snow from your boots, pull a chair up by the fire, and let&#8217;s touch briefly on Convertino v. U.S. Dep&#8217;t of Justice, Civ. No. 04-236 (D.D.C. Dec. 10, 2009). This ruling by a federal district court in Washington, D.C. is being hailed as the next in the Stengart v. Loving Care Agency, Inc. line of cases that supposedly vindicate an employee&#8217;s right to electronic privacy in the workplace. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
